Sunday, July 7, 2013

New wine, new wineskins: Luke 5: 30 -39


As we come to this passage in Luke today in our ongoing study of this book, we must continue to be reminded of the fact that Luke not just writing an autobiography, but He is carefully, deliberately presenting the gospel of Jesus Christ.  And as we said a couple of weeks ago, the gospel is no less than the good news that Christ came to reconcile man with God through the forgiveness of their sins. The gospel is first and foremost, above all else, God’s plan for mankind to be reconciled to Him, to be made righteous through Jesus atonement on the cross as payment for our sins.

 2 Cor. 5:21 so succinctly states the gospel:  “God made Jesus, who knew no sin, to become sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.”  That’s the gospel in a nutshell. 

So Luke is carefully presenting the gospel through this book.  He has in the first few chapters established that Jesus is no less than God in the flesh, conceived by the Holy Spirit in a young virgin, fully God and fully man.  And then Luke  presented a series of convincing proofs of not only that Christ was divine, but since He was divinity He also had the authority to forgive sins.  We saw a few weeks ago that Jesus said to the paralytic who was lowered through the ceiling in front of Him while He was teaching, “My son, your sins are forgiven.”  And to prove that He had that power Jesus followed that up by saying, “So that you may know that the Son of Man has the authority to forgive sins, I say to you, arise, take up your bed and walk.”  The point being that the physical healing was only an illustration of the more important spiritual healing that Christ had come to earth to accomplish. 

Luke continued the presentation of the gospel by fleshing out the nature of sin in the last couple of chapters;  He presents Jesus healing a leper, who was a living illustration of the depravity of sin and the way it corrupts completely and produces uncleanness which separates us from God.  He records Jesus healing the paralytic who was a picture of man’s helplessness to help himself.  And he shows Jesus delivering a man possessed by a demon as an illustration of God’s ability to free man from the oppressiveness and captivity of sin.  So all along Luke is building this house of doctrine concerning salvation. 

Last week, we saw Luke present yet another foundational principle of the gospel, through the record of the  conversion of Levi, who was also known as Matthew, who became one of the 12 disciples.  And the point Luke presented through that illustration was that having become convicted by your sin, and having realized that you are helpless to change it, and that you are captive to sin’s power over you, that you must repent of it, leaving it all behind, and follow after Christ with all your heart. Jesus said to Levi, “follow Me.” So Levi was an illustration of discipleship.  A proper understanding of the gospel is that one must be willing to leave everything and follow Christ’s teaching.

Now today, we find ourselves looking at another event which I believe Luke includes in his gospel to show another essential component of the gospel, and that is  the uniqueness of the gospel, and it’s incompatibility with any other religion or tradition. In other words, you leave everything and follow Christ.  The gospel can’t be added to anything else.  It requires complete exclusivity. 

So as we look at our text we find it’s been some time since Levi’s decision to follow Christ, and Levi has arranged to have all his old friends and acquaintances come over to a banquet at his house to meet Jesus.  And as Jesus is in there preaching the gospel to Levi’s old friends, the Pharisees come around and start grumbling to Jesus’ disciples and questioning them, with the purpose of discrediting Jesus.  These Pharisees appear righteous on the surface, but they have rejected the gospel message of Jesus that says that they are sinners in need of forgiveness, and they are actually angry over being called sinners.  So they are trying to discredit Jesus’ message and Jesus himself.

Look at verse 30, “The Pharisees and their scribes began grumbling at His disciples, saying, "Why do you eat and drink with the tax collectors and sinners?" And Jesus answered and said to them, "It is not those who are well who need a physician, but those who are sick. "I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance."

This is in effect Luke’s thesis statement.  Up to now it has been all introduction.  But now Luke presents in Jesus own words the premise of the gospel.  That Jesus Christ came to save sinners.  But those that don’t first of all accept that they are a sinner, helpless and hopelessly unable to accomplish their own salvation, are unable to be healed by the Great Physician of their spiritual, deadly disease of sin.  But for those that do confess and are willing to repent of their sins, Jesus is saying “I am able to save them, and furthermore, I have come to earth to save sinners.” 

Now these Pharisees and scribes were the leaders of a religious order that we call Judaism.  And perhaps that needs a little explanation so that we can fully understand the situation. . Judaism was a nationalistic/religious system of  laws and traditions, with the belief that God was really only the God of the Jews.  They believed in God, and believed in the scriptures, but they added to the scriptures the Talmud and the Mishna, which were immense volumes containing hundreds of extrapolations from the law, and interpretations of those laws which were called rabbinic traditions.  They held to  a nationalistic religion in which they believed that the Messiah would come to resurrect Israel’s monarchy, and establish their way of life over the world. 

These people prided themselves on their goodness and their belief that they were law abiding, God fearing citizens of the greatest nation on the face of the earth, and that God had granted special blessings to their nation. Judaism stressed things like going to church on the Sabbath, publicly giving alms to the synagogue, making big prayers on the street corners so everyone can see them and fasting.  Fasting was required twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays according to the traditions of Judaism.  Yet in the scriptures, God had only required one fast, and that was on the Day of Atonement which was designed to bring people’s attention to their sin, and the need to repent of their sin.  But the fast that the Judastic system called for was a fast of self righteousness.  They put ashes on their foreheads and walked around town in order to make everyone aware of how religious they were.

So look at verse 33; the Pharisees being convicted want to debate now their spirituality with Jesus.  “And they said to Him, "The disciples of John often fast and offer prayers, the disciples of the Pharisees also do the same, but Yours eat and drink." So it must have been either a Monday or a Thursday, and they were fasting according to their tradition, but they see the disciples of Jesus having this feast with  tax gatherers and sinners and they get indignant.  See, they want to contrast their spirituality, their adherence to the laws and traditions of their religion and contrast their self righteousness to that of Jesus and his disciples. They are convinced of their own righteousness from doing all those external things.  But what they fail to realize is that righteousness can only come as a gift from God to the repentant sinner. It cannot be earned or worked for.

And so Jesus answers the obvious part of their question with an illustration, and then we are going to see Him go to the root of their problem in the last few verses of the chapter.  Because Jesus knows that they don’t really want an answer to their question.  What they are trying to do is validate themselves.  So first He answers the superficiality of their question and then He digs deeper and exposes their corruption underneath. 

First His answer to the question why don’t your disciples fast like we do?  Vs.34, “And Jesus said to them, "You cannot make the attendants of the bridegroom fast while the bridegroom is with them, can you? "But the days will come; and when the bridegroom is taken away from them, then they will fast in those days."

Jesus has already addressed these superficial religious acts of Judaism in Matthew 6, the Sermon on the Mount. He said, "When you give alms, don't sound a trumpet before you." They drew attention to themselves as they gave alms. He said the hypocrites do so in the synagogues and in the streets that they may be honored by men. And He says they have their reward. What is it? The applause of men, that's it.

And then in verse 5, "When you pray, don't be like the hypocrites, they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners in order to be seen by men." They went out there on the corner going through all of their ritual prayers, making sure everyone sees them, appearing spiritual.  Jesus says they have their reward.

And then down to verse 16, there was the third element of their ostentatious religious practice. "When you fast, don't put on a gloomy face as the hypocrites do, for they neglect their appearance in order to be seen fasting by men." Monday, this is what they did, they got up, they put on their worse looking clothes, and they didn't comb their hair. And they threw a few ashes on their heads so they'd look pale and gaunt. And they put a gloomy face and they roamed around, "I'm fasting." And Jesus said they have their reward too, it's from men. In verse 17, "If you're going to fast, anoint your head."  That means wash your face, comb your hair so that you may not be seen fasting by men. In other words, if it's real then it's between you and God.  And the God who sees the secrets of the heart will reward you.

Now back in Luke Jesus was using a very familiar example for them of a wedding feast which often lasted for 7 days.  It was a time of celebration, of joy, as the bride and the groom come together and are joined in matrimony.  Everyone there was familiar with Jewish weddings.  They knew that wedding ceremonies were a time to celebrate,  not to fast.  And they also knew, as I alluded to earlier, that fasting was associated with  grief, either grief over your sin, such as on the day of atonement, or grief over a death or impending death.  But fasting was associated with grief. 

Jesus is saying, there is no reason that my disciples, my followers  should be grieving now.  Their sins have been forgiven.  They have repented of their sins and they have been forgiven.  Instead there is rejoicing, because I am the bridegroom that was promised in Isaiah 62:5 which talks about the coming Messiah redeeming His people and which says, “as the bridegroom rejoices over the bride, So your God will rejoice over you.”  Jesus is actually putting Himself in the place of the bridegroom as  a picture of God rejoicing over his bride.

So that is Jesus answer to their question; He is the bridegroom, and those sinners that are being saved are the bride of Christ.  And that must have been like a knife in the heart of those self righteous Judaisers who would not admit that they needed saving.  The bridegroom was taking another bride, not them.  But now Jesus goes deeper, twisting that knife a little bit to expose the corruption that was at the source of their self righteous indignation.  And Jesus gives three illustrations of the uniqueness of the gospel, and it’s incompatibility with  mixing of any other system. 

Number one, Jesus says in vs. 36, “And He was also telling them a parable: "No one tears a piece of cloth from a new garment and puts it on an old garment; otherwise he will both tear the new, and the piece from the new will not match the old.”  When I was a boy growing up in Eastern North Carolina, my brother and I each got two pairs of jeans a year at the beginning of the school year.  But we didn’t call them jeans in those days, we called them dungarees.  And Mom always got them about 4 inches too long which we rolled up, ‘cause we were growing so fast she wanted to make sure that we didn’t grow out of them before the next year.  The thing is, after about 3 months the knees were worn out.  Today it might be considered fashionable to have holes in our knees, but my Mom would have died if her boys were seen wearing dungarees with the knees worn out.  So she patched them up.  She sowed old material in the knees to make a patch.  And she was a good seamstress, sewed tiny little stitches and tried not to let it show, but it was always apparent that our dungarees had patches.  And it wasn’t cool.  I was embarrassed to wear those pants.  Times have changed today.  I was a hipster and didn’t even know it. 

So the illustration is clear.  But what exactly is Jesus illustrating?  Well, Jesus is referring to the religious system of Judaism, and saying that the gospel is not able to be patched into an old system of works.  The new is going to tear away from the old and at the same time trying to make a patch from the new ruins the new cloth.  They are incompatible.  The second parable is similar but it’s less familiar to us today, it’s saying the same thing but using a different metaphor.  Jesus says in vs. 37; "And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled out, and the skins will be ruined.  But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins.”

The difficulty that I think many of us have understanding this verse and the next is that we are unfamiliar with the ancient winemaking customs of Israel.  I used to work in luxury hotel restaurants, and so I worked with wine makers and served wine, and yet it poses some difficulty for me as well because we don’t have the same understanding of wine today that they had then.  And so I’ve been praying this week for wisdom to understand this passage and what Jesus was saying.  And this is what I believe God revealed to me from the scripture. 

It’s clear that Jesus is referring to two types of wine in this parable.  He speaks of old wine and new wine.  And if you do a word search in the scriptures of the phrase new wine, you will find that there is a Hebrew word tē·rōshe' which means new wine and there is a different word for wine which is yah'·yin.    Now new wine is used in the OT 37 times, and in almost all examples it is associated with blessings from God and was used to describe the wine offering or tithe that was given back to God as the first fruits from their vineyards as part of a sacrificial offering. 

However the common name for wine is used 237 times, and the majority of times it has the association of drunkenness.  In fact the first time it is used in the Bible it speaks in Genesis 9 of Noah drinking it and becoming drunk.  It was associated with strong drink, with mixed drinks.  And there are many, many admonitions against drunkenness in the scriptures that also speak of drinking wine. 

But one of the problems today is that we have lost much of the distinctions that ancient Jews made concerning wine, and as such theologians have debated for centuries the rightness or wrongness of drinking alcoholic beverages such as wine.  But I don’t want to debate that argument here today.  I would simply point out to you that Jesus is making a distinction between new wine and old wine.  And I would like to suggest based on a lot of research that I and others have done, that He is referring to fermented wine as old wine, and grape juice as new wine.  And the fact that grape juice is referred to in historic Jewish literature as wine is undisputed.  It was the fruit of the vine even as fermented wine was and often it is indistinguishable which it is referring to. 

But there is another Biblical illustration that lends credence to my theory that Jesus is referring to unfermented wine.  And that is the example of unleavened bread at the Passover meal.  In the Passover meal prescribed by God in Exodus, the bread was to be made without leaven.  Leaven was always a picture or a type of sin.  The yeast begins a process of fermentation, which causes the bread to rise. And what happens is that there is corruption which causes the bread to puff up.  So as early as in Exodus, there was a call from God to remove the leaven from their midst.  The apostle Paul also would later say that a little leaven leavens the whole lump, another picture of how a little sin becomes entirely corrupting, and causes pride in our hearts.  So this fermentation process is always a picture of sin.  And I believe that when God called the Jews to bring him the new wine as a sacrifice and offering unto God, as a tithe of their first fruits, it only makes sense that He is asking for an unfermented wine, uncorrupted, which is always described as new wine.

Now if that is the case, then this illustration makes a lot more sense.  Some have said that since wine in old wineskins will ferment, then as the gases expand it causes the wineskin to burst.  And that is true, but wine in a new wineskin will burst as well if left unvented. However it is also true that old, cracked wineskins that have dried out will not hold new wine because as you fill it up, it does not have the elasticity which allows it to expand, and instead breaks and spoils the wine.  New wine demands new wineskins that haven’t grown old and dried  and cracked.

But here is the point that Jesus is making.  The old wineskins are nothing less than the old system of Judaism.  And the new wine is the new work that Jesus is doing through the gospel.  And Jesus is saying that the gospel will not mix with their old system of Judaism.  If you mix new wine and old wine, then you are mixing fermented wine with unfermented wine, and as a result the new wine will become fermented.  It will become corrupted. 

Listen, I see a parallel today between Judaism and modern Christianity.  I might even go so far as to say between Judaism and Evangelical Christianity.  There is a parallel.  Like Judaism we claim we worship the one true God.  Like Judaism, we think that God is really sort of exclusively the god of America.  That He has shed His grace on us.  That as Americans we are privy to a degree of blessings from God that the rest of the world doesn’t fully share in. 

According to a Pew poll that came out on July 3, 2013, 78% of Americans consider themselves Christian.  But what exactly does that mean? How can we square what is happening today in our country with the gospel?  I suggest that it means that we have mixed a little bit of God and instead of the Talmud mixed it with a little bit of the Constitution, and throw in a little bit of the Bible with a little bit of the Bill of Rights instead of the Mishna, and we have mixed all that up in a blender with a little bit of the Power of Positive Thinking, and a little bit of the prosperity doctrine, and a little bit of church membership and a little bit of Catholic ritual and a little bit of charitable works and a little bit of Sunday morning worship and we call it Judeo/Christian values.   And because of these external things,  we think that we are ok with God.  We think that God is going to bless us because we call ourselves American Christians and we have a nationalistic fervor that is not much different than that of the Judaisers.  But the truth is we aren’t any better off than the Pharisees.  The Judaisers were not saved and neither I’m afraid are most so called Christians because they are counting on something other than grace and forgiveness.

Listen, Jesus had mercy on sinners, He came to save sinners, but He railed against the self righteous Pharisees and leaders of Judaism because they thought that they were good people.  They thought that a good God would accept good people if they tried to do good things.  But if that is the case, then what in the world was the God of the Universe doing hanging up there on that cross?  Jesus was proclaiming a salvation that depended totally upon God providing a sacrifice for sin.  The Pharisees were proclaiming a salvation that depended upon their self righteousness.  And I’m afraid that the problem with America today is that we have tried to mix a religion of works and self righteousness with the gospel and it isn’t working.  You can’t add the gospel to a religion of cold dead orthodoxy.  God wants new wine in new wineskins.  God demands new birth resulting in a new creation, all things have become new and old things have passed away.

America today is a wineskin that is ready to explode.  We have mixed and blended and added and subtracted until the gospel has become corrupt and stupefying.  We have called good evil and evil good.  We think that our sin isn’t really sin anymore because some judge said it’s ok now.  And the corruption and the fermentation has reached a breaking point.  Yet almost 80% of Americans say we’re ok.  We call ourselves Christians.  We believe in God.  We think we’re God’s chosen people.   We can expect all these blessings to continue because we are such good people. 

Listen, that is exactly what Jesus is talking about in verse 39, He says “no one, after drinking old wine wishes for new; for he says, 'The old is good enough.'"  The problem is that we don’t want to turn away from our sins.  The problem is that we aren’t willing to forsake our old way of life.  We like our lives just the way we are.  And we are like the person in the parable.  We have drunk so much of the fermented wine of the world, we have mixed so much of the old with the new, that we don’t want new life.  We are drunk on the excesses of American materialism and blinded by American Idealism. We have become lukewarm like the church of Laodecia in Rev. 3,  to which Jesus says, “Because you say, "I am rich, and have become wealthy, and have need of nothing," and you do not know that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked, I advise you to buy from Me gold refined by fire so that you may become rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself, and that the shame of your nakedness will not be revealed; and eye salve to anoint your eyes so that you may see.”

We are drunk to the point of being in a stupor and don’t realize that God’s judgment will come upon us as well.  Paul warns in 2 Cor. 6:16 “What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; just as God said, "I WILL DWELL IN THEM AND WALK AMONG THEM; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE. Therefore, COME OUT FROM THEIR MIDST AND BE SEPARATE," says the Lord. "AND DO NOT TOUCH WHAT IS UNCLEAN; And I will welcome you. And I will be a father to you, And you shall be sons and daughters to Me," Says the Lord Almighty.”

I’m going to close with another familiar scripture in 2 Chron. 7:14  in which God says,  “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”  You call yourself Christian?  Good.  God says you better humble yourselves, pray, seek Him and turn from your wicked ways.  Listen, confession has two parts, acknowledging your sin, and then being willing to turn from your sin and follow Christ.  God says when you do that, He will hear that prayer of repentance, that cry for mercy, and forgive your sins, and heal you of this deadly disease of sin, and heal this land.  The only sin God cannot forgive, is the sin that isn’t confessed as sin.  Humble yourself today and call upon God and let’s begin revival right here.  The solution for American Christians is a spiritual revolution, not a political one.  And it must begin first in your heart as you humble yourself before God and confess your sins.  

No comments:

Post a Comment