As we consider today’s text, I am amazed at how this passage
dovetails with what we have been looking at in Ephesians during our midweek
service. By the way, I am going to
try to get out of the habit of referring to Wednesday night as our Bible study,
and instead refer to it as our mid-week church service. There are a lot of Bible studies
around. Sometimes it seems like there
is one on every corner. And while
I have nothing against studying the Bible, I think it’s important to
distinguish that our service is a church and not just a forum for religious
discussion. So in accordance with the doctrine of the church as taught in Ephesians
4:12,13, as a pastor I want to conduct
our midweek service “for the equipping of the saints for the work of service,
to the building up of the body of Christ; until we all attain to the unity of
the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the
measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ.” That equipping of the saints to do the
work, the building up of the church, producing unity of doctrine, the maturing of Christians, to become like
Christ is the distinction between our church and a lot of so called Bible
studies, which just serve as a forum for religious discussion, many of which
have very little to do with the Bible.
Now what we have been learning in our study of Ephesians, is
that what we believe dictates our behavior. And so we can’t separate doctrine from conduct, because
conduct flows from what you believe.
See, God isn’t interested in knowledge in the sense that we know a lot
of facts about the Bible, but God is interested in obedience to what He has
revealed. That’s why Jesus said, “You are my disciples if you do what I have
commanded you.” And love is the foremost commandment of God. So in 1Cor. 13:2 Paul
says, “If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all
knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have
love, I am nothing.” If we say we belong to Christ, then we will be doing the
works of Christ. And chapter 5 of
Ephesians starts off by saying that the premiere work of Christ is the work of
love. We are told to imitate
Christ, and walk in love, even as He loved us.
Now we have spent a lot of time the last few Wednesdays
breaking down exactly what that love looks like and so I won’t review it here
now, except to remind you that love is not determined by attraction or emotion
or even liking someone. But love
is defined by sacrifice, even as Christ loved the church and gave His life for
her. But today we are going to
continue to look at the preeminence of love in the Christian life from another
perspective, and that is found in our passage here in Luke.
Vs.25 says “And a lawyer stood up and put Him to the test,
saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Now a lawyer isn’t what we typically
think of when we hear that title; He’s not talking about a Perry Mason style
criminal lawyer. But it would have
been a person that was an expert in Mosaic law. This man possibly would have been a scribe or a priest who
was considered to be an authority on the laws of Judaism. Now what is significant about these
guys was that they took the 10 commandments and broke them down to the nth
degree. The rabbis said that there
were 613 letters in the 10 commandments, and so they believed that signified
some sort of hidden code that represented 613 laws. And the lawyers were responsible for figuring out those laws and teaching the others.
But they also added to the Mosaic law the rabbinical
law. They had a lot of traditions
that they added, a lot of interpretations which they added to the law that were
just as binding as the 10 commandments.
For instance, in order to keep the law concerning the Sabbath, they had
to interpret what was meant by work.
And so there were dozens of laws written to define what constituted a
bearing a burden, how far you were allowed to travel, or what you were allowed
to do. Lighting a fire on the
Sabbath, for instance, was determined to be work, and so it was forbidden.
But what was really at the heart of these laws was not so
much a desire to fully and completely keep every facet of the law, or even to
keep the intent of the law. But
what was really their intent was putting limits on the law. See, if they could figure out every
nuance of what was required to keep the law, then they could also figure out
loopholes, in order to circumvent the law. And that was really at the heart of what this lawyer was
trying to do. He came to test
Jesus, not to trust Him. He came
confident in his Biblical knowledge.
I read somewhere that these lawyers would have very likely memorized the
first 5 books of the Bible.
Amazing knowledge, but devoid of understanding and puffed up by pride. 1
Cor. 8:1 says, “Knowledge makes arrogant, but love edifies.” See, the problem
with the lawyer was pride. He
needed to be humbled before he could really learn anything.
So the lawyer asks Jesus a question to test Him. That is an important point. We forget sometimes that Jesus could
read thoughts. Luke 11:17 says
Jesus knew their thoughts.
Repeatedly we read that Jesus knew what the people were thinking in
their hearts. And so He knows that
this question is not from a sincere desire to learn. I find that to be true in ministry all the time. I’ve learned the hard way not to have a
running dialogue with people that
ask questions only to try to provoke you, or to try to teach you something, or
make a point that they want to make.
Some people ask questions not because they have a sincere desire to
learn, but because they want to show off what they think they know, or because
they want to try to make you look stupid.
I’m not sure what was the motivation for this lawyer, but my guess is he hoped Jesus would incriminate
Himself, and he could discredit Jesus as a teacher. I think he addresses Jesus as “Teacher” in a somewhat
sarcastic way. That is my opinion
anyway, but maybe I’m being a little paranoid.
The question the lawyer asks is a valid question. In fact, it’s the most important
question that can be asked by any person.
“What shall I do to inherit eternal life?” It was the same question of the rich young ruler in Luke 18:
““Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” It’s a good question. And it’s noteworthy that in both
examples Jesus answers with the Law of Moses. We will address that in a moment. But the question is one that deserves to be turned around
and asked of each one of you this morning; “By what means can you claim to have eternal life?” In other words, what grounds can you
provide for your salvation? If I
were to give you all a card this morning and a pen and give you 5 minutes to
write your answer, I wonder if you could answer that question? How can you know that you have eternal
life? If you cannot answer that
question this morning, then I would love to sit down with you and show you how
you can know that you have eternal life, that your sins are forgiven, and your
name has been written in the Lamb’s book of life.
But as the text indicates, the lawyer wasn’t really asking
because he wanted to know the answer.
He thought he already knew the answer. What he was trying to do was get Jesus to say something that
he could use to trap Him, and ultimately discredit Him.
So Jesus responds in classical rabbinical fashion. He answers the question with a
question. Jesus says, ““What is
written in the Law? How does it read to you?” As I said earlier, it is amazing that Jesus responds to this
lawyers question with this answer.
He doesn’t tell him that all you have to do is say a prayer, or be
baptized, or have a relationship with God. He says, “what is written in the law?” Jesus basically bounces the ball back
over to this guy, knowing his heart.
Knowing that this guy is placing his faith in his knowledge of the law,
in his standing in the temple. He
knows that this lawyer is trusting his eternity to his ability to keep the
law. So basically, Jesus calls him
on it. What does the law say? How does it read to you?
Maybe what prompted Jesus to ask that is found in another
statement Jesus made in Matt. 7:2 “For
in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it
will be measured to you.” So Jesus
may be saying to this lawyer, “Hey, you put your trust in the law? OK, then
what does the law say? You want to be judged by the law? Then what does the law
require?”
Now what is significant about the way Jesus phrased that
question was that all religious Jews knew full well the answer. Part of the
practice of law abiding Jews was to recite the Shema, a prayer, twice
daily. The Shema is from Duet. 6:4
and 5. "Hear, O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one and you shall
love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your
might. And these words which I'm commanding you today shall be on your
heart." And then they added from Leviticus, "You shall love your
neighbor as yourself," Leviticus 19:18. Not only was this law recited
twice daily, but it was written on the doorpost of their homes, it was carried
in the phylacteries, those little boxes on their forehead that the Pharisees
wore. They knew full well these
laws were the foundation of the law.
All of the commandments can be found in these two: Love God and love your neighbor. So the lawyer quoted from the Shema.
Then listen to Jesus response. “You have answered correctly; Do this and you will live.” That’s an amazing statement, even a surprising
answer in light of our view of grace.
But we need to understand that the NT never sets aside the moral demands
of the OT, but rather affirms them.
Jesus said I did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it. Obedience has never stopped being
essential to faith. But in the new
covenant, the Holy Spirit comes reviving our conscience, and stamping the law
of God upon our hearts, that we might keep His commandments.
Grace doesn’t eradicate the requirements of the law. But rather grace provides the
substitute who kept the law perfectly, that we might be made righteous
vicariously, so that we might receive power from the Holy Spirit to do the works
of God, being obedient to His will.
See that is the fulfillment of the prophecy of Ezekiel 11:19 when God says, “And I will give them one heart, and put a new
spirit within them. And I will take the heart of stone out of their flesh and
give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in My statutes and keep My
ordinances and do them. Then they will be My people, and I shall be their
God.” The power of the Holy Spirit
is not given to glorify ourselves, that we might fall out on the floor or
stagger around like drunken people, or so we can speak some gibberish that no
one understands, but the power of the Holy Spirit is given that we might have
the power to do what God commands us to do, that we might through our obedience
glorify God.
But let’s consider Jesus answer; do this and you will
live. Is that really true? If you were able to keep the law
perfectly, would you be saved?
Well, Jesus said you can.
But the problem is we can’t.
Jesus kept the law perfectly and He had eternal life. But there is no way that we can do the
same. The Bible says that “all
have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.” God’s standard for righteousness is beyond our grasp. That was the point of the law, to show
God’s standard of righteousness, and show us that we were unable to keep
it. So Gal. 3:24 tells us then
that “the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be
justified by faith.” The law teaches us that we can’t keep the law, therefore
we need a substitute who can, and that is Jesus Christ.
But look at this lawyer again. I’m sure he is convicted by the law’s standard for
righteousness; Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, all
your strength and your neighbor as yourself. I mean, who wouldn’t be convicted of sin if they looked at
that law honestly? Who among you
can say that He loves God fully and completely with every fiber of your
being? If you are even the least
bit honest you must confess that you fall short of loving God to that
standard. Oh, we might claim we
haven’t murdered anyone, we haven’t coveted, or haven’t committed adultery, (even
though Jesus would show that if you hate you are guilty of murder), but none of
us can really claim to love God that much. Except maybe this lawyer.
He answers back, “well then, who is my neighbor?” But see,
he wanted to save face, to convince people that he was righteous, though he
knew he wasn't. He wanted to
maintain his façade of self righteousness. And so he said to Jesus, "So who is my
neighbor?" He jumps right
over the loving God part. That’s
the epitome of arrogance. He basically is saying, "I'm okay with God, and
I’m ok with my neighbor. But let’s define neighbor. Because he was looking for the loophole. And so he wants to debate
Jesus.
That’s the hallmark of a person that is prideful, by the
way. They want to wrangle over
words, bring up obscure meanings and so forth. And as Paul told Timothy, often their purpose is to be
contentious. 1Tim. 6:3, “If anyone advocates a different doctrine and does not
agree with sound words, those of our Lord Jesus Christ, and with the doctrine
conforming to godliness, he is conceited and understands nothing; but he has a
morbid interest in controversial questions and disputes about words, out of
which arise envy, strife, abusive language, evil suspicions, and constant
friction between men of depraved mind and deprived of the truth, who suppose
that godliness is a means of gain.”
Paul says the root of such rebellion is conceit, which is pride. That is the root of this lawyer’s
sin. It’s pride and an
unwillingness to be taught, an unteachable spirit. Instead, He wants to school Jesus, he wants to show how much
he knows. And in so doing he shows
his lack of humility.
Jesus is a lot more gracious than I would have been. If it were me, I would maybe have told
this guy I won’t cast pearls before swine and moved on. But I think Jesus is graciously giving
this guy a chance to repent. And
so Jesus tells a story to illustrate how God defines a neighbor. It’s a parable, and it must have been a
convicting story for this lawyer as well as I’m sure it is for you and me.
Jesus said ““A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho,
and fell among robbers, and they stripped him and beat him, and went away
leaving him half dead.” Now
notice, in this story, Jesus describes this fictitious character as just a
man. No nationality or
classification. No mechanism to
determine who the man is. Just a
man. So right off the bat, we see
that God’s definition of a neighbor is not classified by proximity, or by
nationality, or any of the usual definitions. Just a random, ordinary man in a place far from everyone’s
home, is beaten and robbed and left half dead on the side of the road.
But immediately the emphasis of the story changes from the
misfortunate victim, to the passerby’s. Jesus describes three men that passed
by. The first one, ironically
enough, is a priest. And vs. 31
says, that when the priest saw the man, he moved to the other side of the road
and passed him by. Now this must
have hit home with the lawyer to some degree, because in all likelihood, he was
a priest. A priest would have
known the law, and known that the law stipulated that you were to show kindness
to strangers. Yet he goes to the other side of the road to avoid him.
The second guy is a Levite. All priests had to come from the tribe of Levi, but he was
more than likely considered a priest’s assistant. All priests had to descend from the line of Aaron, in
addition to being a Levite. But
not all Levites were of the tribe of Aaron. So he worked with the priesthood. He worked in the temple or the synagogue and he also would
be conversant in the law. But he
too passed on the other side of the road.
And then the third guy comes by. Jesus describes this man as being on a journey, but the
really important thing is that he was a Samaritan. Now that would have been a shocking thing for the lawyer and
the people listening. Samaritans
were not considered real Jews.
They had intermarried with Gentiles. They had become corrupted in their
theology. They had no inheritance
in Israel. They had no right to
enter the temple. They were
outcasts. Jews would walk a great distance to go around Samaria in order to
keep from coming into contact with Samaritans. So the Jews and Samaritans were enemies of one another.
But notice that this Samaritan shows compassion on the man
who was lying on the side of the road.
He shows kindness, and what he is illustrating for Jesus’ purposes is
the principle of loving your neighbor.
Now a lot of people get this whole parable wrong, because they see this
kindness as some sort of morality
tale. The proponents of the social
gospel use this as an example of what Christianity is all about. But please understand something. Jesus isn’t telling this parable as an
illustration of salvation. He is
telling this parable as an illustration of loving your neighbor. Jesus isn’t teaching that doing good
deeds and being a good Samaritan is the way to inherit eternal life. He is teaching that loving your
neighbor is a characteristic of one who has inherited eternal life. That is an important distinction.
However, this parable is intended to convict the lawyer of
his sin by the realization that he falls short of loving his neighbor. And if the lawyer will confront his
sin, and repent of his sin, then he can be a candidate to inherit eternal life
if he then trusts in Jesus as the substitutional atonement for his sin. But if he defends his sin, and says he
has no sin, then there is no salvation for him.
Now you know the story, and I won’t belabor all the usual
details. I’m sure you have heard
them before. But I will say that
the compassion this Samaritan illustrates the loving your neighbor and, is
characterized by three things.
First of all, he doesn’t show love because he expects to be compensated
or rewarded. He loves someone who
is unable to love him back. He
loves someone who is considered his enemy. He shows him kindness and compassion and helps him without
expectation of a return.
Secondly, his love is sacrificial. He uses his own supplies to help this man, supplies that he
was counting on for the success of his own journey. He generously gives the innkeeper money which amounted to
leaving a credit card with a stranger and saying, whatever it takes to help
this person, take it. Use it. Love is costly, love requires sacrifice.
And thirdly, it was a love in spite of inconvenience. The Samaritan is on a journey. People are waiting for him. He had places he needed to go. Important deadlines. He was in a hurry. And yet he takes the time to tend to
him, goes out of his way to take him to an inn, and even spends the night there
with him. Not only that, he
promises to return. That kind of
love requires a lot of time, taking time out of your busy schedule to minister
to others. Considering other’s
needs as greater than yours.
Jesus shows through this story that the lawyer was trying to
define the wrong term. He was
trying to define who was his neighbor so he could exempt certain people from
love. But Jesus defines the
problem as that of being neighborly.
Not who constitutes a neighbor. A neighbor is just a man, or a woman,
any man or woman. But the issue
that God is concerned about is how we act towards others; are we being a neighbor? Are we showing the love of God towards
our neighbors?
Jesus asked the lawyer in vs. 36, “Which of these three do
you think proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell into the robbers’ hands?”
“And he said, “The one who showed mercy toward him.” Then Jesus said to him,
“Go and do the same.”
Listen, I asked you at the beginning to consider how you would
answer the question of how to inherit eternal life. And so I end by asking you to consider if you show the fruit of Christianity which Jesus
command in vs. 37, to go and show mercy to our neighbors. You say you are a Christian? Then the works of a Christian will be
to show mercy to strangers, to love your enemies, to show compassion to your
neighbors. James said in
ch.2:7, “Even so faith, if it has
no works, is dead, being by itself.”
He said you will show or reveal your faith by your works. That is the proof of your faith.
Listen, your Christianity is not measured by your
intellectual knowledge of Biblical facts, or even upon some spiritual experience
you may have had, but your
salvation is judged by your compassion and love for others. How can you say you are a Christian and
ignore your lost neighbors, not to mention your own friends and family members? Are they not as much of a helpless
victim in need of salvation as the man lying on the side of the road in the
parable? How can a Christian
ignore the lost? Not necessarily
the lost in Africa, or India.
Though certainly there is a need to take the gospel to the ends of the
earth. But how can you ignore your
neighbors? The people you meet by chance, like the lady at the checkout counter? How can you ignore the guy that works
on your appliance or your car? How
can you ignore the helpless, hopelessly lost, dying souls living down the road
from you who you pass by every day, several times a day? How can you fail to
show compassion to your neighbors by sharing the gospel with them? How can you do that and say that you are
a Christian? If you are a
Christian, how can you callously withhold the antidote from a lost and dying
world?
I pray that we learn from this parable that love requires a
sacrifice. Love is not limited to
the loveable, or those we find attractive, or even to those that will love you
back. Let’s remember that love
will require us at times to be inconvenienced. But we are commanded to love one another even as Christ loved
us and gave his life for us. If
Christ was willing to sacrifice His life, His throne, for our salvation, then I
hope and pray that we can allow ourselves to be inconvenienced a little as
well, that we can sacrifice a little as well, for the sake of the kingdom of
heaven. Jesus said, “Go and do
likewise.” Let’s share the love of Christ with a dying world.
No comments:
Post a Comment